e-ISSN: 2717-7157
  • Home
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Table of Contents
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Current Issue
Archive
Search
Online Subscription Login
Subscription Form
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Glokom-Katarakt 2007 , Vol 2 , Num 1
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Glaucoma Drainage Devices for the Treatment of Post Penetrating Keratoplasty Glaucoma
Ekrem KURNAZ1, Anıl KUBALOĞLU2, Arif KOYTAK3, Erol COŞKUN3, Yasin YILMAZ3, Yusuf ÖZERTÜRK4
1S.B. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Göz Kliniği Başasistanı, İstanbul, Dr.
2S.B. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Göz Kliniği Şef Muavini, İstanbul, Dr.
3S.B. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Göz Kliniği, İstanbul Asist. Dr.
4S.B. Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 2. Göz Kliniği Şefi, İstanbul, Prof. Dr.
Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of glaucoma drainage deviges in IOP control for the treatment of post penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma

Materials and Methods: Thirty four patients with post penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma who underwent drainage deviges for the treatment of post penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma were retrospectively evaluated. As implant, molteno tube was used in 24 patients and AGV was used in 10 patients. During implantation procedure, the grafts were clear in 22 patients and remaining 12 grafts were opaque.

Results: The mean follow-up time was 23.2 months. The cumulative success rate in IOP control was 85.2% at 1. year, 65.3% at 3. year and the cumulative graft survival rate was 77.2% at 1. year and 74.1% at 2. year and 59% at 3. year, respectively. Graft failure was observed in 9 (40.9%) patients postoperatively.

Conclusion: Glaucoma drainage devices were successful in IOP control for the treatment of glaucoma. However, graft failure is important risk factor for these patients. Keywords : Glaucoma, penetrating keratoplasty, glaucoma drainage devices

Home
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Table of Contents
Contact