e-ISSN: 2717-7157
  • Home
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Table of Contents
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Current Issue
Archive
Search
Online Subscription Login
Subscription Form
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Glokom-Katarakt 2020 , Vol 15 , Num 2
Abstract Free Full Text Similar Articles Mail to Author
The Comparison of Bacterial Contamination and Antibacterial Effi cacy of the Anti-Glaucomatous Eyedrops with and without Preservatives
Kemal OZULKEN1, Mehmet Ozgur CUBUK2, Nese INAN1, Ugur ACAR3, Julide Sedef GOCMEN1, Ahmet AKMAN4
1MD. TOBB ETU Medical School Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
2MD. FICO, Istanbul Training ve Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
3MD. Selcuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey
4MD, Ahmet Akman Eye Clinic, Ankara, Turkey
DOI : 10.37844/glauc.cat.2020.15.22 Purpose: To investigate the bacterial contamination risks and antimicrobial activities of the preservative-free and preservative-containing anti-glaucomatous ophthalmic solutions.

Materials and Methods: Ophthalmic solution bottles of preservative-free brimonidine 0.15% (D1), benzalkonium chloride-containing (BAK) brimonidine 0.15% (D2), purite-containing brimonidine 0.15% (D3) and BAK-containing timolol maleate dorzolamide fi xed combination (D4) were included in this study in terms of microbial contamination risk. Moreover, microbial contamination of the two bottles [preservative-free brimonidine 0.15% (D7) and BAK-containing brimonidine 0.15% (D8)] was investigated after contacting their tips with the lower eyelid edge of a researcher. Every day twice a day for 60 days; the caps of the bottles were opened and they were closed after waiting for 20 sec. One drop was added from these six bottles 11 times during the study period (60 days) to the six separate and renewed blood-agar mediums. Microbial contamination was evaluated every visit by examining the blood agar mediums by the same microbiologist. In terms of antimicrobial effi cacy; D1, D2, D3 and D4 were compared with the antibiotic containing ophthalmic solutions; moxifl oxacin (D5) and tobramycin (D6) by using agar well diffusion method.

Results: No bacterial growth was observed in the mediums of D1, D2, D3, D4 and D8 bottles. The bacterial growth of methicillin-susceptible and resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci was observed in the medium of D7 bottle on some days. A large inhibition zone was seen around D5 and D6, whereas a smaller inhibition zone was detected around D2 and D4. No inhibition zone was detected around the D1 and D3 bottles.

Conclusions: Multi-dose preservative-free antiglaucomatous ophthalmic solutions have not any risk of bacterial contamination unless the tip of the bottle is contaminated. Keywords : Benzalkonium chloride, Brimonidine, Glaucoma, Purite, Multi-dose non-preservative ophthalmic solutions

Home
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Table of Contents
Contact